August 2026 document set

The March 2026 Position Statement is locked as originally issued. Later findings, clarifications, and policy work are published separately. Public-use templates below reflect the Project’s current framing: CASP’s trade-association status is not itself the concern; the accountability question is whether provider-business representation is being treated as independent clinical, scientific, practitioner, consumer, or field-wide consensus.

The Position Statement

Authority Without Authorization

The full statement documenting CASP's governance structure, financial conflicts, accreditation ownership, credentialing inconsistencies, the private equity context, and what independent governance should actually look like. All claims are sourced from CASP's own public materials and peer-reviewed research.

Full Position Statement — Locked Historical Document

Governance, Accountability, and the Question of Authority in Applied Behavior Analysis

Issued March 2026 and preserved as originally published. Endorsements apply to this statement, not automatically to later Project analyses, correspondence, or recommendations.

May 2026

Guidelines Development Standards Framework

Documents the pay-to-play structure through which CASP's clinical standards are developed, the guidelines transfer from the BACB, and the case that field standards should be freely available to every provider required to meet them.

Open Addendum →

Payers, Medicaid & Program Integrity

The accountability work now has an operational side

These materials move beyond identifying structural problems and ask a practical question: what can payers and public programs require now, using authority they already have, while avoiding blanket requirements that punish ethical providers along with bad actors?

Payer Brief — August 2026

What Payers Already Have Authority to Require in ABA Provider Contracts

A payer-facing framework for clinical authority, qualifications, ownership/control, supervision, intensity-sensitive oversight, accreditor due diligence, network adequacy, and meaningful outcome review.

Read the Payer Brief →

Public Template — Clinician / Provider

Write to a Health Plan or Payer

A carefully sourced send-your-own letter for clinicians and ABA providers asking plans to review accreditation, clinical governance, qualifications, ownership/control, meaningful outcomes, and network impact.

Download editable letter →

Public Template — Family / Member / Citizen

Write to a Health Plan or Payer

A public-use version that makes the same accountability request without asking the sender to claim clinical expertise or professional experience they may not have.

Download editable letter →

Public Template — Boards / Legislatures / Regulators

Request Independent Review of ABA Standards & Accreditation

A source-grounded template for state boards, legislative offices, Medicaid agencies, and regulators addressing representation, accreditation independence, provider qualifications, ownership/control, and direct public oversight.

Download editable letter →

Federal Source — August 2026

CMS State Medicaid & CHIP Applied Behavior Analysis Toolkit

The federal toolkit informing the Project’s current Medicaid, program-integrity, provider-qualification, ownership, utilization-management, and quality-measurement work.

Open Medicaid.gov →

Overview & Media

For journalists, payers, and new readers

Shorter documents for those encountering these concerns for the first time, or for sharing with decision-makers who need the argument in a condensed form.

Executive Brief

Governance, Accountability, and Authority in ABA

A concise summary of the core governance concerns for payers, regulators, and professional bodies encountering this project for the first time.

Read & Download →

Media Statement

For Journalists and Press

A press-ready summary of the documented concerns, the regulatory context, and the specific questions this project is asking professional bodies and payers to address.

Read & Download →

Letters to Professional Bodies

Formal correspondence to the field's governance institutions

These are dated records of correspondence the Project sent to professional and public bodies. They are preserved as historical documents and are not silently revised as the Project’s analysis develops. Where professional bodies did not provide substantive engagement, the Project is not repeating the same request through updated letter campaigns.

What comes next

The next institutional step under consideration is broader professional and scientific scrutiny — including a potential multi-author call-to-action paper — rather than another round of separate Project letters.

Letter — Sent April 2026

Letter to the BACB

Asks the BACB to formally review how the ABA Practice Guidelines are being used by CASP — specifically whether CASP's documented position on RBT credentialing is consistent with the consumer protection purpose for which those guidelines were developed.

Read & Download →

Letter — Historical Correspondence

Letter to ABAI

Asks ABAI to define what responsibility the field's scientific body will assume when commercial entities translate behavior analysis into clinical standards, accreditation requirements, workforce models, and even new ABA ventures — and whether ABAI will distinguish scientific authority from commercial promotion.

Read & Download →

Letter — Published May 2026

Letter to APBA

Asks APBA's board to examine whether the organization's deepening institutional entanglement with CASP is consistent with APBA's founding purpose: giving credentialed individual practitioners a voice independent of the corporate organizations that employ them.

Read & Download →

Field Versions — Public-Use Templates

Current public-action templates

These templates are intended for practitioners, families, and members of the public to use where an outside decision-maker can independently impose safeguards: health plans, Medicaid agencies, boards, legislatures, and regulators. The Project is not asking supporters to send a second round of letters to professional bodies that were already contacted.

All sources cited in the position statement and newer Project work are compiled on the Sources & References page →

Public-Use Letter — Board / Legislature / Regulator

Write to a Public Decision-Maker

Requests independent review before private standards or accreditation programs acquire regulatory, Medicaid, or network-participation significance.

Download & Send →

Public-Use Letter — Payer

Write to Your Health Plan

Choose the clinician/provider version or the family/member/citizen version from the payer section above.

Go to payer letters →