Five diagrams that tell the story

Every other comparable healthcare profession has built the governance structures ABA is missing. These diagrams show what that looks like, what CASP has built instead, and why the difference matters. All claims are sourced from publicly available materials — follow the links to verify.

01 — The Ecosystem

What ABA's governance structure should look like — and what's missing

Every mature healthcare profession separates five governance functions across independent bodies: scientific authority, credentialing, independent standards, practitioner representation, and regulatory oversight. ABA has four of the five. The missing layer — an independent multi-stakeholder standards body — is the vacuum CASP filled by self-appointment.

ABA governance ecosystem diagram showing five layers of governance with the independent standards body layer highlighted as missing

02 — The Comparison

How every comparable profession handles governance — and how ABA compares

Medicine, dentistry, psychology, and social work all have independent standards bodies and ownership protections. ABA is missing both. This is not a coincidence — every other field built these structures before outside capital arrived in force. ABA did not.

Comparison table showing governance structures across medicine, dentistry, psychology, social work, and ABA

03 — The Timeline

How CASP built its authority — step by step, over more than a decade

What looks like organic institutional growth is, on examination, a systematic acquisition of authority over every layer of the autism services ecosystem. Each step created a new revenue stream and deepened the field's dependency. Each step was taken without field-wide authorization.

Timeline showing CASP's expansion from 2009 private meeting through 2025 acquisition of Jade Health

04 — The Loop

The conflict of interest that runs through everything CASP does

CASP's board sets the standards. CASP's subsidiary accredits compliance with those standards. CASP lobbies payers to require that accreditation. Providers pay fees to stay in networks. Those fees fund CASP. The board members whose organizations benefit from these decisions are the same people making them. There is no independent check anywhere in the loop.

Circular diagram showing CASP's self-reinforcing conflict of interest with no independent check

05 — The Standard

What legitimate governance looks like — and how CASP compares

The Joint Commission accredits hospitals. It has an independent board with consumer representation, a multi-stakeholder standards process, and a 501(c)(3) legal obligation to the public. CASP has a board of large-provider executives, standards developed by member organizations for member organizations, and a 501(c)(6) legal obligation to dues-paying members. These are not equivalent.

Side-by-side comparison of The Joint Commission and CASP across six governance dimensions